V.Rukmani, v. The Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.11.2021 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.NO.28748 OF 2017 1.V.Rukmani 2.V.Ranganayaki 3.V.Padma

...Petitioners

Vs The Tahsildar Mylapore Circle, Chennai - 600 028.

... Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.09.2017.

For Petitioners :

Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondent :

Mr.V.Nanmaran Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rst https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

The Tahsildar Mylapore Circle, Chennai - 600 028.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.61974 W.P.No.28748 of 2017 NK(CO) PM/11/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/