Madras High CourtWP Crl./840/2025disposed of

P.T.Dhinakar v. The Inspector General Of Police,

2026-06-02Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN and WPMP Crl.No.375 of 2025 P.T.Dhinakar S/o. P.Thanthondi, 58/1, Perks School Road, Uppilipalayam, Coimbatore - 641015.

..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Inspector general of Police, West Zone, Thomas Park, Race Course, Coimbatore 641018.

2. The Superintendent of Police State Bank Road, Coimbatore - 641018.

3. The Inspector of Police, Perur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

4. S.Ravi Shankar, No.48, Marvel Parampariyam, Kalapatti Road, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore - 641035.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the 4th respondent to avoid breach of peace and tranquillity in the Nirmala Nilayam Retirement Community (Retirement Homes) at

Theethipalayam, Coimbatore District by considering petitioners complaint petitions dated 24.03.2025 and 15.07.2025.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) - R1 to R3 No Appearance - R4

ORDER

The Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the 4th respondent to avoid breach of peace and tranquillity in the Nirmala Nilayam Retirement Community (Retirement Homes) at Theethipalayam, Coimbatore District by considering petitioners complaint petitions dated 24.03.2025 and 15.07.2025. 2.On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that on receipt of the complaints from the petitioner, enquiry was conducted and closed.

3.However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner developed the property by constructing 40 houses, in which the 4th respondent is also one of the purchasers. Thereafter , the 4th respondent occupied the common area which is meant for all the house owners and prevented the petitioner to provide the common amenities to the purchasers.

He further submits that the 4th respondent is a retired judicial officer. 4.In view of the above, the petitioner is hereby directed to lodge a fresh complaint on a fresh cause of action, if any. The 3rd respondent, on receipt of the complaint from the petitioner, is directed to deal with the complaint in accordance with law.

5.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected WPMP.Crl.No.375 of 2025 is closed. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kas To

1. The Inspector general of Police, West Zone, Thomas Park, Race Course, Coimbatore 641018.

2. The Superintendent of Police State Bank Road, Coimbatore - 641018.

3. The Inspector of Police, Perur Police Station, Coimbatore District.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

kas 02-06-2026