← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/29021/2024granted

Kumar v. The State Rep. By

2024-11-20Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

Crl.O.P.No.29021 of 2024 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner/A2, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 21(d)(e)(f) and 36 of Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1982, in S.T.O.R.No.04 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 25.12.2023 at about 6.00 a.m., the petitioner along with other accused were found to be illegally cutting 12 pieces of sandalwood worth Rs.12,000/- from Bommipampatt Reserve forest and on seeing the respondent police, the accused have run away from the scene of occurrence. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

He would further submit that only based on the confession statement of A1, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. He would further submit that A1 was arrested and released on bail. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), while opposing the grant of anticipatory bail, would submit that the petitioner along with the other accused were found to be in possession of 12 pieces of sandalwood worth Rs.12,000/-, which was taken illegally from the reserved forest area and on seeing the respondent, the accused had escaped from the scene of occurrence. He would further submit that A1 was arrested and released on bail.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the fact that co-accused was arrested and released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate, 2/4

Omalur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

20.11.2024 ata 3/4

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ata Crl.O.P.No.29021 of 2024 20.11.2024 4/4