← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/19156/2023ordered

S.Sekar v. State Represented By

2023-12-08Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Crl.A.No.1459 of 2023 S.Sekar ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City-I.

(Crime No.28/2009/AC/CC-I ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(2) of Cr.P.C., pleased to suspend the sentence and enlarge the petitioner on bail in Special Case No.14 of 2011 dated 22.11.2023 passed on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and Special Judge for Trial of Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Tiruvallur pending disposal of the above appeal.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.N.Krishnamurthy 1/6

For Respondent : Mr.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/appellant, seeking suspension of sentence, imposed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and Special Judge for Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Tiruvallur, vide judgment in Special Case No.14 of 2011 dated 22.11.2023.

2. The conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner/appellant is as follows:- Under Section Sentence 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act, three years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.20,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.

13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 three years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.20,000/-, in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment.

3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, there are arguable points available in the Criminal Appeal, which is not likely to be taken for final hearing in the near future and the petitioner/appellant has 2/6

got a fair chance of succeeding in the Criminal Appeal and hence, the sentence imposed against the petitioner/appellant may be suspended and the petitioner/appellant may be enlarged with bail. He further submitted that the trial Court, while convicting the petitioner, has suspended the sentence till 20.12.2023.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the prosecution has proved the case beyond reasonable doubts and the trial Court on finding the petitioner/appellant guilty, convicted him as stated above. Therefore, he vehemently opposed for grant of suspension of sentence.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant and Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant, this Court is of the view that the sentence of 3/6

imprisonment can be suspended on certain conditions. Accordingly, till the disposal of the Criminal Appeal, suspension of sentence is granted, on the following conditions :- i. The petitioner/appellant shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and Special Judge for Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Tiruvallur ;

ii. The petitioner/appellant shall appear before the trial Court on the first working day of every English Calendar month at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. 08.12.2023 nti 4/6

To

1. The Chief Judicial Magistrate and Special Judge for Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Tiruvallur,

2. The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City-I.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

nti in Crl.A.No.1459 of 2023 08.12.2023 2/2 6/6