← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27362/2023granted

Moorthy v. The State Rep. By

2023-12-01Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan4 pages

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.599 of 2023 registered by the respondent Police for the offences under Sections 379 IPC. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side).

3.It is stated that the accused persons had stolen 3 tons of Iron worth about Rs.3,00,000/- from CMRL and loaded the same in a EICHER vehicle and escaped from the scene of occurrence. A1 and A2 had been arrested. The property had been recovered. There are no previous case against the petitioner herein.

4.Taking all the factors into consideration, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the 1/4

date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00.a.m. until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take 2/4

appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;

01.12.2023 sli 3/4

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

sli 01.12.2023 4/4