Muvendhen v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.11.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Muvendhan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, S.H.O. Chidamabaram Taluk P.S., Cuddalore.

(Cr.No.218 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Cr.No.218 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner/ A1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.09.2024, seeking bail in Crime No.218 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 311 of BNS Act.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with another accused came on a two wheeler and snatched the phone and silver bracelet of the defacto complainant by threatening him with a knife. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner, who is in custody from 03.09.2024, stating that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, while objecting for grant of bail to the petitioner, submitted 2/6

that the petitioner along with another accused came on a two wheeler and snatched the phone and silver bracelet of the defacto complainant by threatening him with a knife. He further submitted that there is no previous case as against the petitioner. However, if he is released on bail, there is a possibility of him absconding and not available for further investigation.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidambaram, and on further conditions that: 3/6

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 06.30 p.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 4/6

21.11.2024 Anu To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidamabaram.

2. The Inspector of Police, S.H.O. Chidamabaram Taluk P.S., Cuddalore.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA., J.

Anu 21.11.2024 6/6