Eswaran v. The State By

in Crl.A.No.1549 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

This matter was taken up for hearing under the caption "For Being Mentioned" today at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for petitioner would submit that this Court by an order dated 10.11.2025 granted suspension of sentence. However, he would submit that in the said order, in para 4((b), it was mentioned that one surety must be a blood surety. He would submit that there is no blood surety available for him. Hence, he prayed for modification in the order.

3. Considering the above submission, Registry is directed to substitute Para 4(b) of the order as follows:- Para 4(b) "(b) the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail 1/4

on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court (FAC), Tiruppur."

4. Registry is directed to incorporate above correction in the Order of this Court in Cr.M.P.No.18715 of 2025 in Crl.A.No. 1549 of 2025 dated 10.11.2025 and issue fresh order copy to the petitioner.

5. Time is extended for further period of two weeks for executing sureties from the date of receipt of the copy of order. 27.11.2025 rpp 2/4

T .V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rpp 3/4

27.11.2025 4/4