← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/26001/2025granted

Muhamed Yusuf v. State Rep. By, The Inspector Of Police

2025-09-22Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.26001 of 2025 Muhamed Yusuf ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Thirunavallur Police Station, Kallkurichi District (Crime No.456 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.456 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) :

Mr.V. Venvizhi For Respondent(s) :

Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *******

ORDER

1/5

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.08.2025, for the offence under Sections 123 of BNS r/w 24(1) of COTPA Act in Crime No.456 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that based on a secret information, the respondent police went to the spot and found that the petitioner along with other accused were in possession of 6 kgs of banned tobacco products . Hence a case was registered by the respondent police. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is only a show owner and other accused are suppliers. However, he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is one previous case pending 2/5

against the petitioner.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the period of incarceration undergone by the Petitioner and the fact that the petitioner is only the shop owner and the other co-accused person are the suppliers, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner herein with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Ulundurpet and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance 3/5

with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[d] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

22.09.2025 smn To

1. The Inspector of Police, Thirunavallur Police Station, Kallkurichi District

2. The Judicial Magistrate, No.II, Ulundurpet

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Cuddalore

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

smn Crl.O.P. No.26001 of 2025 22.09.2025 5/5