← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27678/2023granted

Settu v. State By Inspector Of Police

2023-12-08Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Settu S/o. Mariyappan

...Petitioner/Accused

Vs.

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thevoor Police Station, Salem District.

(Crime No.189 of 2023) ...Respondent PRAYER:

Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.189 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police on such terms and conditions. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4

ORDER

The petitioner seeks bail in Crime No.189 of 2023, registered by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 307 of IPC. The petitioner had been taken into custody on 15.10.2023. 2.It is stated that the petitioner and the injured belong to the same village and also went over to a TASMAC shop to drink liquor together and naturally entered into a quarrel, which escalated into violence. 3.Taking all the factors into consideration and the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

4.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Sankari, and on further conditions that: - [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police 2/4

everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

08.12.2023 ata C.V.KARTHIKEYAN.

J.

3/4

ata To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Sankari.

2. The Central Prison, Salem.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thevoor Police Station, Salem District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

08.12.2023 4/4