← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/19522/2023ordered

Gopalakrishnan v. The Tahsildar

2024-03-04Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar1 pages

Crl.M.P.No.19522 of 2023 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.57516 of 2023 M.NIRMAL KUMAR , J.

This petition is filed to condone the delay of 398 days in filing the above revision.

2.Today, a counter has been filed by the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent stating that the revision has been filed with a delay of 398 days. He further states that the petitioner is the cause for the disturbance in the area and without any possession, he is attempting to create disturbance as though he is in possession of the property by filing one petition or other.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of the property and seeks time for producing all the documents and to make submissions at the time of admission of the revision.

4.In view of the same, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered.

04.03.2024 vv2 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis