← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/4169/2019closed

K.Jayabaskaran v. K.Ravichandran

2024-01-18Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.01.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR CRP.Nos. 4169 of 2019, 4290 of 2019 & 167 of 2020 and C.M.P.Nos.930 of 2020, 27963 of 2019, 27158 of 2019 In C.R.P.No.4290 of 2019 1.S.Vijayalakshmi 2.S.Shyamala .

.. Petitioners Vs.

1.K.Ravichandran 2.K.Jayabaskaran

...Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.4138 of 2016 in I.A.No.16921 of 2011 in O.S.No.3477 of 2009 dated 17.09.2019 passed by the learned III Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai. For Petitioners : M/s.C.Samivel :Mr.A.D.Janarthanan For Respondent 2 : M/s.I.David Singh In C.R.P.N0.167 of 2020 1/4

Mr.K.Ravichandran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.S.Vijayalakshmi 2.S.Shyamala 3.K.Jayabaskaran

...Respondents

PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 17.09.2019 allowing the I.A.No.4138 of 2016 in I.A.No.16921 of 2011 in O.S.No.3477 of 2009 on the file of III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai and modified the same for reduce from Rs.4000 of the market value of the property. For Petitioner : Mr.A.D.Janarthanan :M/s.C.Samivel For Respondent 3 : No appearance In C.R.P.No.4169 of 2019 .

K.Jayabaskaran .. Petitioner Vs.

1.K.Ravichandran 2.S.Vijayalakshmi 3.S.Shyamala

...Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.4138 of 2016 in I.A.No.16921 of 2011 in O.S.No.3477 of 2009 dated 17.09.2019 passed by the learned III Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai. For Petitioner : M/s.I.David Singh 2/4

:Mr.A.D.Janarthanan For Respondent 2 &3 : M/s.C.Samivel COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions are arising out of orders passed by the Court below in final decree petition in partition suit.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents submitted that main final decree application was dismissed for default and the petition to restore the same is pending.

3. In view of the disposal of the main final decree petition, the prayer in the civil revision petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly, the civil revision petitions are closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in case the final decree petition is restored to the file. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

18.01.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No nr 3/4

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

nr To The learned III Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai. CRP.No.4169 of 2019, 4290 of 2019 & 167 of 2020 and C.M.P.Nos.4318 of 2020 & 24754 of 2019 18.01.2024 4/4