The Enforcement Officer v. Manonmanian
Crl.M.P.No.19191 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61034 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19193 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61046 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19194 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61044 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19199 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61039 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19200 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61040 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19202 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61037 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19205 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61036 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19206 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61035 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19208 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61032 of 2019 Crl.M.P.No.19211 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61033 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19215 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61048 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19216 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61054 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19217 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61058 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19218 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61053 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19219 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61056 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.
19220 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61050 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19221 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61022 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19222 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61052 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19223 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61023 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19224 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61024 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19225 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61025 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19214 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61031 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19213 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61038 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19226 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61027 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19227 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61026 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19228 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61030 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19229 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61028 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19230 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61029 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19231 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61051 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19232 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61041 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19233 of 2019 in Crl.A.
SR.No.61055 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19234 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61043 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19235 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61021 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19236 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61049 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19237 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61047 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19238 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61057 of 2019, Crl.M.P.No.19239 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61045 of 2019 P.VELMURUGAN .,J The reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits are satisfied. The delay is condoned. Accordingly, the petitions are ordered.
2. Registry is directed to number the above Criminal Revision Cases, if it is otherwise in order and print the name of the counsel Mr.B.Kumarasamy, for R2.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve the copy of the typed set of papers to the respondents' counsel.
27.10.2021 mfa 2/3
P.VELMURUGAN .,J mfa Crl.M.P.No.19191 of 2019 in Crl.A.SR.No.61034 of 2019 & etc., batch 27.10.2021 3/3