← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/29878/2024dismissed

R.Ramesh v. Union Of India

2024-11-28Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

Crl.O.P.No.29878 of 2024 T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.01.2019, in NCB F.No.48/1/02/2019-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C), 27(A), 28 & 29 of NDPS Act, seeks bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the second petition and the earlier petition was dismissed by this Court in Crl.OP.No.7169 of 2024 dated 02.08.2024. He further submitted that that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case, as if the petitioner along with other accused was found in possession of 107 kgs of ganja. He further submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is suffering incarceration from 09.01.2019 and he is ready to abide any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

3. The learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police submitted that based on a specific information, the petitioner along with other accused was found in possession of 107.02 kgs T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

rri of ganja and cash of Rs.10,000/- and they procured ganja from Andhra Pradesh and transporting it in Chennai, with the help of Renault Duster vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN-09-BT-4474. He further submitted that the petitioner was actively participated in the possession of contraband with other accused persons. He further submitted that the trial is going to be commenced. However, he vehemently opposed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the materials available on record.

5. Taking into consideration the quantity of the contraband seized from the petitioner is a commercial quantity, and it needs detailed investigation, and there is no change in circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 28.11.2024 rri Crl.O.P.No.29878 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis