← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/33809/2019disposed of

V.Selvaraj v. State Represented By

2020-01-22Honourable Mr Justice N. Seshasayee2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.01.2020 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE Crl.O.P.No.33809 of 2019 V.Selvaraj .... Petitioner / Accused No.5 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police EOW-II, Coimbatore.

(Crime No.6 of 2019) .... Respondent/Complainant Prayer :- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439(i) (b) to modify the condition imposed in Crl.MP.No.2921 of 2019 on the file of the learned Special Judge for TNPID Cases, Coimbatore on 18/11/2019 in Crime No.6 of 2019.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vivekananthan For Respondent : Ms.S.Thankira Govt Advocate [Criminal Side]

ORDER

This petition is filed to modify the condition imposed in Crl.MP.No.2921 of 2019 on the file of the Special Court for TNPID Cases, Coimbatore, on 18.11.2019 in Crime No.6/2019.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as A5 in Crime No.6/2019, inter alia under Section 5 of the TNPID Act, 1997, and that he has filed a petition seeking bail before the trial Court in CMP.No.2921/2019. While so, the trial Court has granted statutory bail to the petitioner and has imposed a condition to deposit 10,00,000/-, before it, within 15 days from the date of release.

3. When the matter came up before this Court on 17.12.2019, the learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] made a statement that an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- is lying in the savings account of the petitioner and that his savings account has been frozen. Hence, this Court Vide its order dated 17.12.2019, has required the learned Government Advocate to ascertain if any fund is still available in the savings account of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Be that as it may, the petitioner now wants refund of the amount. Suffice to say that even without any condition such as the one, if the petitioner is an accused under Section 5 of TNPID Act, his properties are liable to be attached under Section 7 of the TNPID Act.

5. The learned Government Advocate now makes a statement that the amount lying in the petitioner's account has been attached.

6. In view of the above, the present prayer of the petitioner cannot be acceded to. The petitioner is now required to workout his remedy provided in TNPID Act, 1997, and this Court grants fifteen days time to the petitioner from today, to comply with the conditions imposed by the trial Court.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ds To:

1.The Special Judge Special Court for TNPID Act Coimbatore.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.K.Nivesh Kumar, Advocate SR.No.8787(04/02/2020) Crl.OP.No.33809 of 2019 RSI(CO) GMY(03/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/