Praveen Kumar v. The State Represented By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Praveen Kumar Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by the Inspector of Police T-14 Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai District, Tamil Nadu Crime No. 777 of 2024 Respondent(s) PRAYER This Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioners on Anticipatory Bail in the event of Crime No. 777/2024 on the file of the Respondent Police.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.H. Eshwar For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Udayakumar, GA (Crl.side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.777 of 2024 pending on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners, along with one Mr. Jayandhkoli, received a sum of Rs.7,00,000 as lease amount for a house property. However, it was later discovered that the property was already mortgaged with Punjab National Bank, thereby cheated the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to furnish substantial sureties and ready to abide any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the anticipatory bail to the petitioners, reiterated the prosecution's case and on instruction submitted that the investigation in this case is at crucial stage and if the petitioner is granted anticipatory, there is a

possibilities of tampering the witnesses and hampering the investigation.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the overtact leveled against the petitioner and that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Alandur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further

conditions that:

[a] If the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks; [d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police officer as and when required; [f] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [g] the petitioner shall not abscond either during

investigation or trial;

[h] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

18-09-2025 Gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The Inspector of Police T-14 Pallikaranai Police Station, Chennai District, Tamil Nadu.

2. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Alandur.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR J.

gbi CRL OP No. 25594 of 18-09-2025