Paramasivam v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.10.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Paramasivam ... Petitioner Vs.

THE STATE REP BY 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE, SALEM DISTRICT.

2.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ATTUR, SALEM DISTRICT. 3.THE TAHSILDAR, TAHSILDAR OFFICE, GANGAVALLI TALUK, SALEM DISTRICT. 4.PICHAKARAN ... Respondents PRAYER:

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to grant patta to the 4th respondent without considering the objection based on the representation dated 03.09.2025 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thirumoorthy 1/4

For Respondents For R1 to 3 : Mr.P.Ganesan, Government Advocate

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for direction to respondents 1 to 3 not to grant any patta to the fourth respondent in respect of the subject land.

2.

It is seen that the petitioner is residing at the village where the subject property comprised in survey No.371/1, 371/2 and 387, Manmalai Village admeasuring 30 acres of land is situated. It is classified as tharisu Government land.

3.

On perusal of the representation submitted by the petitioner, it is revealed that the petitioner finds that the subject property belongs to a temple i.e. Varadaraja Perumal temple. However, there is absolutely no document to show that the subject land belongs to any temple. It is classified as tharisu and it is belongs to the Government. 4.

On instruction, the learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 3 submitted that already the subject land was leased 2/4

out in favour of a third party. However, the petitioner objected for the same though he has absolutely no locus to raise objections while dealing with the property by respondents 1 to 3.

5.

In view of above, the direction sought in this writ petition cannot be considered. As such, this writ petition is devoid of merits and the same is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 10.10.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok To 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE, SALEM DISTRICT.

2.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ATTUR, SALEM DISTRICT. 3.THE TAHSILDAR, TAHSILDAR OFFICE, GANGAVALLI TALUK, SALEM DISTRICT. 3/4

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

lok 10.10.2025 4/4