Pushpa v. The State Rep By Its,
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.580 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 329(4), 296(b) and 118(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage & Loss) Act, 1992, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.
2.Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioners, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks indulgence of this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and a false case has been given by the defacto complainant due to property dispute. He further submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. 3.The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police, opposing for the grant of anticipatory bail, is that it is a case and a case in counter. Due to the Page No.1 of 4
property dispute, the petitioners had attacked the defacto complainant with stones and also damaged the windows and household articles. He further submits that the defacto complainant was admitted in the hospital and she was discharged after two days.
4.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions and accordingly, they are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that: [a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled;
Page No.2 of 4
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
26.11.2024 vv2 Page No.3 of 4
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
vv2 26.11.2024 Page No.4 of 4