← Library
Madras High CourtWP/36307/2003disposed of

Sakthi Coffee Estates (P) Ltd. v. 1.The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.

2017-10-04Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.10.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.36307 of 2003 Sakthi Coffee Estates (P) Ltd., Rep. By its Managing Director, 102, Coimbatore Road Pollachi -642 002 Coimbatore District.

.. Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By its Secretary, Planing & Development Department, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009.

2. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3. The Tahsildar, Valaparai.

4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, (Agrl. Engg.) Soil Conservation Seheme 23, Marappatti Street, Pollachi Coimbatore District.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issuance a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondents, relating to the orders of the fourth respondent in Ref.No.A.2103/2000 dated 30.05.2003, Ref.No.A/2103/2000 dated 30.05.2003 and Ref.No.A.2103/2000 dated 09.06.2003 and quash the same and to direct the respondents herein to grant 90% subsidy as per the scheme of the Central Government.

For Petitioner : Mr.Kandavadivel Doraisami For Respondents : Mr.S.Diwakar, Spl.G.P. for RR-1 to 4

ORDER

The petitioner has come forward with above Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondents, relating to the orders of the fourth respondent in Ref. No.A.2103/2000 dated 30.05.2003, Ref.No.A.2103/2000 dated 30.05.2003 and Ref. No.A.2103/2000 dated 09.06.2003 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to grant 90% subsidy as per the scheme of the Central Government.

2. When the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Government has passed orders stating that there is waiver of loan amount as per G.O.Ms.No.326, Agricultural (Ve.Po) Department, dated 05.11.2008 and that there was an agreement between the parties to that effect. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also produced a copy of the receipt showing that the petitioner-Company has paid a sum of Rs.10,24,100/- paid and that the Government has made a mention in the receipt that there are no further dues on the issue in question. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of, as no further adjudication is required. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar mm To

1. The Secretary, Planing & Development Department,.

Fort St. George Chennai-600 009.

2. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3. The Tahsildar, Valaparai.

4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, (Agrl. Engg.) Soil Conservation Seheme 23, Marappatti Street, Pollachi Coimbatore District.

+1 C.C. to M/S.MUTHUMANI DORAISAMI Advocate SR.NO. 71251 +1 C.C. to Government Pleader SR.NO. 71412 W.P.No.36307 of 2003 T.R (28/10/2017)