← Library
Madras High CourtSUO MOTU TR/15040/2025disposed of

State Government v. Nagaraj

2025-09-23Honourable Mr.Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY (C.C.No.100140 of 2005 of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirukalukundram Taluk, Chengalpattu) State rep. by Inspector of Police, E-1, Mamallapuram Police Station, Kancheepuram district.

... Petitioner Vs.

Nagaraj ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms.G.V.Kasthuri Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Suo Motu Case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025. 2.The case was registered in Cr.No.325 of 2005 dated 20.05.2005 for the alleged offence under Sections 279 and 304(A) of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. It is reported that in this case, the defacto complainant is not traceable and it is not known any claim petition has been filed or not. It is submitted that Page No.1 of 3

the case is presently pending at the stage of warrant and there is no previous or subsequent case against the accused.

4. Considering the factual matrix, context of the case, the antecedents of the accused, the reason for absence from his usual place, and the submission that, despite best efforts, the warrant could not be executed, it is evident that even if the accused is brought to face trial, it would impinge upon his right to a speedy trial. Due to the passage of time, a meaningful trial is unlikely, and no useful purpose would be served.

5. Accordingly, the case in C.C.No.100140 of 2005 of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirukalukundram Taluk, Chengalpattu quashed and this Suo Motu Transfer Case stand disposed of. It is made clear that disposal of this case will not, in any manner, affect the right to file a claim petition.

23.09.2025 veda electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed / disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

Page No.2 of 3

veda 23.09.2025 Page No.3 of 3