K.A.Dhamodharan v. Union Of India,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND WMP NO. 35912 OF 2019

1. K.A.Dhamodharan S/o.K.S.Arumugam, No.163, Madam Street, Podaddurpet, Pallipet Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

2. N.Kothandan S/o.Narasimmalu, No.62, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Anumandha Putheri,Chengalpet.

3. P.K.Gajarajan, S/o.s.Kanniappan, No.6, Ulagalandhar Koil Street, Kancheepuram.

4. P.Maniappan, S/o.P.K.Ponnuswamy, No.1, First Cross, Balaji street, Gandhi Nagar, Avadi, Chennai 600 054.

5. G.Purushothaman, S/o.C.Ganapathy, No.4/86, Third Cross Street, AGS Colony, Velacherry, Chennai 600 042.

Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary to Government of India Ministry of labour and Employment New Delhi 110 001.

2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Opp Swagat Hotel, Royapetteh High Road, Chennai Tamil Nadu 600 014.

3.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, (pension), Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office S.1, Tnhb, Phase -iii Sathuvachari Vellore 632 009.

4.Kancheepuram Central Cooperative, Bank Ltd., Rep. By Its General Manger, Kancheepuram.

Respondent(s) Directing the respondents Nos.1 to 3 herein to accept the return and remittance of the amounts being the difference between contribution on ceiling limit and contribution on actual wages disbursed to and withdrawn by the petitioners at the time of their retirement by superannuation without insisting on any payment of interest thereon and to pay the full pension based on their employers contribution on actual wages remitted by employer of the petitioner with arrears and prospective payments in the light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 04.10.2016 in the case of R.C.Gupta and others Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, The Employees Provident Fund Organization and others.

For Petitioner(s):

MS. D.AROKIA MARY SOPHIA For Respondent(s):

Ms.Anuradha Sekar For R1

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and to that effect, he has made an endorsement in the bundle.

2. Recording the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17-04-2025 rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

To 1.Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary to Government of India Ministry of labour and Employment New Delhi 110 001.

2.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Opp Swagat Hotel, Royapetteh High Road, Chennai Tamil Nadu 600 014.

3.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, (pension), Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office S.1, Tnhb, Phase -iii Sathuvachari Vellore 632 009.

17.04.2025