T.Palanisamy v. A.Thangavelu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.No.37250 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.44706 of 2004 T.Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.A.Thangavelu 2.The Regional Transport Authority, Dindugul.

3.The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-104. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the third respondent relating to Appeal No.540 of 2004/A6 dated 27.10.2004 modifying the order of the second respondent made in R.No.12088/A2/2004 dated 01.07.2004 and quash the same.

For petitioner : Mr.S.Govindaraman For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Spl. G.P.

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the submission and also the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Regional Transport Authority, Dindugul.

2.The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Chennai-104.

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO.59314 KJI(co) sm:18.9.2018 W.P.No.37250 of 2004 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/