← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/3069/2024allowed

S.Rani v. State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-01-21Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jothiraman5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.01.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN S.Rani ..

Petitioner v.

1. State of Tamil Nadu rep.by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009

2. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai, Chennai

3. The Superintendent Central Prison, Puzhal Chennai 600 066

4. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Tharamani, Chennai District ..

Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to

the detention order in Memo No.BCDFGISSSV No.749/2024 dated 02.07.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the petitioner's son the detenu Murali aged about 38 years, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner ::

Mr.S.Amarnath For Respondents ::

Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) The order of detention passed by the second respondent in proceedings BCDFGISSSV No.749/2024 dated 02.07.2024 is sought to be quashed in the present habeas corpus petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. The detenu has been arrested on 31.05.2024. The detention order was issued on 02.07.2024 after prolonged delay. Two adverse cases are relied on registered under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Act. Pertinently, both the adverse cases registered in the year 2018 have no proximity with the ground case. The ground case can be dealt with by the police authorities under the ordinary law. The detenu is in actual imprisonment under the preventive detention law for more than seven months. Considering the facts and circumstances, we are inclined to interfere with the impugned detention order.

4. Accordingly, the detention order passed by the second respondent in proceedings BCDFGISSSV No.749/2024 dated 02.07.2024 is hereby set aside and the habeas corpus petition is allowed. The detenu viz., Murali, S/o Subramani, aged 38 years, now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, unless his confinement is required in connection with any other case.

Index : yes (S.M.S.,J.) (M.J.R.,J.) 21.01.2025 ss

To

1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009

2. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai, Chennai

3. The Superintendent Central Prison, Puzhal Chennai 600 066

4. The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Tharamani, Chennai District

5. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN,J.

ss 21.01.2025