The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep v. The Surana Tarpo Industries,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated :: 10.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.26346 of 2003 THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (CT) CHENNAI (NORTH) DIVISION Chennai 6.

...

petitioner Vs 1 THE SURANA TARPO INDUSTRIES NO.6 RAMANAN ROAD CHENNAI.79.

2 THE SECRETARY TAMIL NADU SALES TAX APPELLALTE TRIBUNAL (AB) CHENNAI.104.

...

respondents Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to the order dated 29.6.2001 made in S.T.A.No.1173 of 2000 and quash the same. For petitioner ... Mr.K.Venkatesh, Government Advocate For respondents ... No appearance

O R D E R

Heard Thiru.K.Venkatesh,learned Government Advocate appearing for the petitioner. Though notice has been served on the respondents, none appear for them.

2. It is fairly submitted by the learned Government Advocate that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

of State of Tamil Nadu vs. M/s.Binny Ltd., [1997-98 (3) TNCTJ 195 (SC)]. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tar To 1.THE SECRETARY TAMIL NADU SALES TAX APPELLALTE TRIBUNAL (AB) Chennai 104.

+1cc to the special Government Pleader(Taxes), S.R.No.48261 W.P.No.26346 of 2003 SV(CO) CU(17/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/