Subramani v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.16931 of 2004 Subramani .. Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner, Ramanathapuram Municipality, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

.. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the counsel resolution Ramanathapuram Municipality bearing No.614 dated 26.05.2004 with regard to resolution No.3 (3) canceling the allotment of shops in eastern side of Anna School pertaining to Shop No.2 allotted to the petitioner on the ground that the shop was run by binamee and also to bring the shop under fresh auction and quash the same consequently permit the petitioner to continue the lease for the period from 1st July 2004 to 30th June 2007 by accepting the 15% of the enhanced amount from the petitioner of the previous year lease amount. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.S.Jayakumar

ORDER

Today(13-07-2017), when the matter is taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. The relief prayed by the petitioner in the present writ petition seeking for extension of lease period was not granted. Much water has flown and consequently, the lease period between 1st July 2004 to 30th June 2007 had already expired. In view of the developments, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous, as nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar sts To:

The Commissioner, Ramanathapuram Municipality, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

Order in W.P.No.16931 of 2004 NM(CO) VR(07/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/