K.Ramesh v. The District Collector

W.M.P.No.39223 of 2024 W.M.P.No.39223 of 2024 in W.P.No.36350 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'original impugned proceedings passed by the third respondent dated 05.11.2024 bearing reference Na.Ka.No.A2/4107/2024' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Ms.N.Lavanya, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the original impugned order is not readily available with the petitioner at the time of filing of the writ petition but a photo copy of the impugned order is filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMP.

Page Nos.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.M.P.No.39223 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., mk

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned order is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S., J] [K.R.S., J] 04.12.2024 mk W.M.P.No.39223 of 2024 in W.P.No.36350 of 2024 (2/2) Page Nos.2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis