P.Bhavani v. The District Revenue Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.01.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.NOS.35718, 35721, 35722, 35724, 35727, 35728 & 35730 OF 2019 P.BHAVANI ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35718 of 2019 S.JOTHI ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35721 of 2019 K.MURUGAN ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35722 of 2019 A.POONGAVANAM ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35724 of 2019 K.JAMAL UDEEN ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35727 of 2019 B.SUMATHI ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35728 of 2019 N.SUBRAMANIYAN ... Petitioner in W.P.No.35730 of 2019 Vs.
1.
The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue, Tiruppur.
2.
The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue, Coimbatore.
3.
The Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI/EOW/Chennai Crime No. R.C.No.12/E/2011 4.
M/s Paazee Forex Trading India Pvt. Ltd., Rep.By Managing Director Mr.Mohan Raj Sri Muthu Plaza, 320, Avinasi Road, PN. Road, Tirupur - 641 602.
... Respondents in All WP's
COMMON PRAYER in W.P.NOS.35718, 35721, 35722, 35724, 35727 & 35730 OF 2019:- These Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass order on the representation dated 21.05.2019 given to the 2nd respondent and which was forwarded by the 2nd respondent to the 1st respondent on 06.08.2019.
WP.No.35728 of 2019:- Directing the 1st Respondent to consider and pass order on the Representation dated 21.05.2019 given to the 2nd Respondent and which was forwarded by the 2nd Respondent to the 1st Respondent to the 1st Respondent on 23.07.2019. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sairaman For Respondents : Ms.Saradha Devi G.A. (Crl. Side) for R1 & 2 For Respondent : Mr.K.Srinivasan Spl.Public Prosecutor (CBI Cases) COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed to consider the representation dated 21.05.2019 made by the petitioners to the 2nd respondent, which was forwarded to the 1st respondent on 06.08.2019.
2.The case of the petitioners is that they have deposited money in M/s. Paazee Forex Trading Private Limited. Thereafter, on 11.08.2011 they came to know that the owner of the said Chit fund was arrested and the chit company was closed. Hence, the petitioners made representations to the 2nd respondent on 21.05.2019 and the 2nd respondent in turn sent all the papers to the 1st respondent, but till date no action was taken. Hence, these petitioners approached this Court by way of filing these writ petitions.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that, when the petitioners presented the cheques issued by the Chit company in the bank, the bank officials informed that all the accounts in the name of said Chit Fund Company were blocked. Hence, they made a representation to the 2nd respondent, and the same was forwarded to the 1st respondent,
but the said representation was not considered. Therefore, these petitioners pray to direct the 1st respondent to consider their representation.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that they have laid a charge sheet in C.C.No.9 of 2011 on the file of Special Judge for TNPID Cases, Coimbatore (FAC) Under Sec.4 of Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning Act, 1978 Sec. 420 IPC and Sec.5 of TNPID Act, 1997) and arrested two persons namely Mohan Raj and Komalavalli, for the alleged fraud committed by them in the said chit transaction.
5. It is also seen from the records that similar request was made by some other petitioners before this Court in Crl.M.P.Nos.8514,4078, 2574 of 2017, 13430, 5860 & 6524 of 2016 in Crl.O.P.No.3715 of 2019, wherein this Court had issued a direction to the District Revenue Officer/ 2nd respondent herein to verify the fixed deposit receipts and proofs submitted by the victims and take immediate steps to disburse the amount to the victims as early as possible.
6.In the light of the above facts of the case, the first respondent herein, who is the competent authority to take action, is directed to verify as to whether the petitioners have received the deposited money or not and dispose of the case in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7.With the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition if any is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To 1.
The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue, Tiruppur.
2.
The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue, Coimbatore.
3.
The Additional Superintendent of Police, CBI/EOW/Chennai Crime No. R.C.No.12/E/2011 4.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras-104.
5.
The Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.S.Sairaman, Advocate, S.R.No.1276 W.P.Nos.35718, 35721, 35722, 35724, 35727, 35728 & 35730 of 2019 GMR(CO) CS/11/02/2020