Navash v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Navash ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Hosur Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

Crime No.779 of 2023 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial in S.C.No.81 of 2024 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur.

For petitioner :

Mr.A.Tamilselvan For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4

O R D E R

The petitioner was arrested on 12.12.2024, on execution of NonBailable Warrant issued by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur, for the offence punishable under Sections 427, 452, 302, 109, 120B, 34, 147, 148 and 341 of IPC pending trial in S.C.No.81 of 2024 in respect of Crime No.779 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The petitioner herein earlier arrested and bail granted by the Trial Court in Crl.M.P.No.2146 of 2024 dated 20.09.2024. After the case was posted for committal to the Court of Sessions in S.C.No.81 of 2024 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur, the trial has been commenced. On 15.11.2024, the petitioner did not appear before the Court. Hence, Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) was issued. Thereafter, the respondent police arrested the petitioner and remanded to judicial custody on 12.12.2024.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that three bail petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed by the Trial Court in Crl.M.P.Nos.41, 63 and 151 of 2025 by 2/4

orders dated 13.03.2025, 22.04.2025 and 23.07.2025 respectively. Also, this Court by order dated 11.09.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.24793 of 2023 dismissed the petitioner's bail petition. He further submitted that the case is now pending for trial and the petitioner has 21 previous cases.

4. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has bad antecedents, and taking into account that this is the second bail petition with no change in circumstances, and that the trial date is now likely to be fixed, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 06.10.2025 cda K.RAJASEKAR, J.

cda 3/4

To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hosur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Hosur Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

06.10.2025 4/4