← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/26275/2025dismissed

Damodharan v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police,

2025-09-24Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Dhamodharan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Nemili Police Station, Ranipet District.

Crime No.298 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.298 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner :

Mr.V.Karthick For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 02.07.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 7(1)(a) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2005 and Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, 1959, in Crime No.298 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with two others created a ruckus on the public road showing a patta knife and threatening the public. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that already this Court dismissed the petitioner's bail petition in Crl.O.P.No.23082 of 2025 dated 20.08.2025. He further 2/4

submitted that the petitioner has 12 previous cases with no change in circumstances. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also taking into fact that this is the second bail petition with no change in circumstances. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 24.09.2025 cda 3/4

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

cda To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Arakonam.

2.The Inspector of Police, Nemili Police Station, Ranipet District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

24.09.2025 4/4