← Library
Madras High CourtOA/925/2025closed

Ms Dec Infrastructure And Projects India Pvt Ltd v. V Vijay Kumar

2025-09-22Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh7 pages

1/7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

1. Ms DEC Infrastructure and Projects India Pvt Ltd Represented by its Authorised Signatory Gopalakrishnan Palnisamy, 2-1-434/1, Nallakunta, Hyderabad, Telangana-500044 Applicant(s) Vs 1.V Vijay Kumar 2.M Lavanya 3.Dr R Murali 4.A Asha 5.K Lakshmi 6.S.Kugananthan 7.R Padmanabhan 8.Charulatha 9.Suganya

2/7 10.M.S.Gouri Shankar 11.K.Ranganathan 12.Ananthi 13.Aarthi 14.N Murali 15.M.Anusha 16.M Anand 17.R.Nagarajan 18.N.Aishwarya 19.Sachin Kaushik 20.G V Jayanthi 21.Helen George 22.B S Radhakrishnan & Sons 23.A.Chetan @ Chetan kumar 24.K.Latha 25.S.Suganthi Lakshmi 26.S K Karthikeyan 27.A Menaka 28.Balasubramani 29.V Thanigaivel

3/7 30.M Lakshmanan 31.R Nagarajan 32.N Aishwarya 33.N Sachin Kaushik 34.Balasubramani 35.D.Rajalakshmi 36.K Pradeep 37.R Nandhagopal 38.A R Kannammai 39.D Rajammal 40.DR Tajudeeen 41.Rajarajeshwaran 42.Padmanabhan 43.Ruth Helena 44.K N Ravikanth 45.N Ayyadurai 46.M Kumari Bhagavathi 47.S Arumugam 48.R Rengarajan

4/7 49.R Vishwanathan 50.S Rajendran 50.Jawahar Colony Owners Association A Registered Societies under Societies Act of 1975 Having Office at 169 Block, 4th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. Respondent(s) PRAYER This petition filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules r/w Section 9(1)(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, praying to grant an order of Interim Injunction restraining the Respondents from entertaining into any agreement with third parties for the purpose of development/redevelopment or construction of the Schedule Mentioned Property. For Applicant(s):

M/s.R.Ramasubramaniam Raja

ORDER

This Court on hearing the learned counsel for applicant found that even though negotiations were going on till the year 2024, right from November 2024 till the date of filing of this application, not even the trigger notice has been given under Section 21 of the Act. Therefore, this Court expressed its mind to the learned counsel for the applicant that there is no manifest intention to arbitrate.

5/7 2.The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant will issue the trigger notice and thereafter, approach this Court. 3.Recording the above submission, this application is closed with liberty to approach with the same cause of action.

22-09-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ssr

6/7

7/7 N.ANAND VENKATESH J.

ssr 22-09-2025