← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2735/2020disposed of

Jeyaram Sangaya v. The Commissioner,

2025-06-23Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh6 pages

1/6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-06-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH and WMP No. 3186 of 2020 Jeyaram Sangaya Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Commissioner, Thiruverkadu Municipality, Thiruverkadu, Thiruvalur District.

2.Kumuthavalli, Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to conduct enquiry based on the petitioner's representation dated 31/07/2019 and delete the name of the 2nd respondent in the Death Certificate of petitioner son S.Ezhil Selvam in Registration No.D-2018.33-10705-000467 dated 31/10/2018 and issue fresh death Certificate.

2/6 For Petitioner(s):

Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For Respondent(s):

Mr.E.Vijay Anand Additional Government Pleader for R1

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner dated 31.07.2019, wherein the petitioner has sought for the deletion of the name of the 2nd respondent from the death certificate issued to the petitioner's son dated 31.10.2018.

2.Heard Mr.C.K.M.Appaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.E.Vijay Anand, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent.

3.The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that the 2nd respondent has fraudulently represented herself as the wife of the petitioner's son and has

3/6 managed to include her name in the death certificate. According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent is already married to one Soundarajan and they have a daughter and the 2nd respondent has fraudulently informed the hospital where the petitioner's son was admitted due to cardiac arrest, as if she is the wife. The petitioner's son died on 30.10.2018 and in the death certificate, the 2nd respondent has managed to include her name as the wife. Under such circumstances, a representation was given to the 1st respondent to delete the name of the 2nd respondent. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court. 4.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the grievance expressed by the petitioner, if the representation made by the petitioner dated 31.07.

2019, has not already been disposed of, the 1st respondent shall deal with the representation and conduct an enquiry after affording opportunity to the 2nd respondent and take a decision within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

4/6 5.This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23-06-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes kp

5/6 To The Commissioner, Thiruverkadu Municipality, Thiruverkadu, Thiruvalur District.

6/6 N.ANAND VENKATESH J.

kp and WMP No. 3186 of 2020 23-06-2025