P.Shanmugam v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.07.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. No.39 of 2020 P.Shanmugam .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam.

2. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam.

3. V.Jayapal

4. V.Mohan

5. V.Balu

6. V.Selvam

7. V.Devagi

8. Visalam [R3 to R8 impleaded vide order dated 05.10.2021 made in WMP.

No.21677/2021 in WP.No.39/2020 by this Court] .. Respondents

Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writs of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's application dated 29.10.2019 seeking for the mutation of revenue records on the basis of the proceedings of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.No.A4/1301/2019 dated nil.03.2019. For Petitioner : Mr. G.Jermiah For Respondent : Mr. G.Krishna Raja, AGP

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's application dated 29.10.2019 seeking for the mutation of revenue records on the basis of the proceedings of the first respondent made in Na.Ka.No.A4/1301/2019 dated nil.03.2019.

2. When the matter is called today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect and sets liberty to approach the competent civil court.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the endorsement, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs.

11.07.2022 Index : Yes Internet : Yes Rli To

1. The Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam.

2. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Arakkonam Taluk, Arakkonam.

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

rli W.P. No.39 of 2020 11.07.2022