K.Geetha Krishnan v. The State Rep. By
1/6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 31-10-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH K.Geetha Krishnan Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep. By The District Revenue Office, Office Of The Collectorate Salem, Salem District 2.The Tasildar Atthur, Salem, Salem District.
3.Mr. Subramani 4.Mr. Pachamuthu 5.Mr. Mani Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Ceertiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the
2/6 impugned order in Na.Ka.1782/2025/A2 dated 11.06.2025 passed by 2nd Respondent and quash the same, consequentially direct the 2nd Respondents to transfer patta infavour of petitioner and others in respect of land in (i) survey Nos.681/1 (ii) survey Nos.690/4 (iii) survey Nos.690/2 situated at Ramanaicken Palayam Village, Atthur Taluk, Salem District. For Petitioner(s):
Mr.K.Karthik For Respondent(s):
Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate for R1 and R2
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 11.06.2025 and for a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner and other with respect to the subject property.
2.Heard Mr.K.Karthik, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.
3/6 3.In the considered view of this Court, the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy before the Revenue Divisional Officer under the provisions of the Patta Passbook Act. Therefore, the petitioner has to necessarily file an appeal before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer. However, the petitioner seems to have filed an appeal before the 1st respondent, the 1st respondent is not an appellate authority against the order passed by the Tahsildar.
4.In view of the above, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit an appeal before the Revenue Divisional Officer and on receipt of the same, the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer shall deal with the same on its own merits and in accordance with law and pass orders, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the appeal from the petitioner. The rival parties shall also be given opportunity before final orders are passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer.
4/6 5.This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 31-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ssr
5/6 To 1.The State Rep. By The District Revenue Office, Office Of The Collectorate Salem, Salem District 2.The Tasildar Atthur, Salem, Salem District.
6/6 N.ANAND VENKATESH J.
ssr 31-10-2025