← Library
Madras High CourtWP/37519/2024disposed of

A.Subramaniyan v. The District Collector

2026-04-07Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07-04-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY A.Subramaniyan S/o.Arumugam, No.179, Moopanar Kovil Street, Siruvachur, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector Collectorate,Salem District 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur, Salem District 3.The Tahsildhar Taluk Office, Thalaivasal, Salem District 4.Revenue Inspector Kattukottai Circle, Attur, Salem District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents to take appropriate action to remove the Road formed in petitioners patta land situated at Deviya Kurichi village, Thailavasal Taluk, in Salem District bearing Survey Number 184/1 , 184/2A1, 184/2A2 by considering the earlier order passed by the second respondent dated 21.7.2023 and report of the deputy surveyor dated 1.6.2024 by considering petitioners representation dated 17.8.2024

For Petitioner(s):

Ms.K.Saranya For Respondent(s):

Mr.C.Gawthamaraj, GA

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.08.2024.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, a representation was filed by the petitioner to take appropriate action to remove the Road formed in petitioner's patta land situated at Deviya Kurichi village, Thailavasal Taluk, in Salem District bearing Survey Number 184/1, 184/2A1, 184/2A2 by considering the earlier order passed by the second respondent dated 21.7.2023 and report of the deputy surveyor dated 01.06.2024. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

3. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the respondents 1 & 2 within a period of 8 weeks.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondents 1 & 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.08.2024 and after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other rival parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 07-04-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The District Collector Collectorate,Salem District 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur, Salem District

3.The Tahsildhar Taluk Office, Thalaivasal, Salem District 4.Revenue Inspector Kattukottai Circle, Attur, Salem District

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.

nsa 07-04-2026