← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/26202/2025dismissed

Venkatesan v. The State Represented By, The Inspector Of Police

2025-09-23Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No. 26202 of 2025 Venkatesan ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Vaniyambadi Taluk Police Station Thirupathur District.

[Crime No. 341 of 2025]

...Respondent

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.341 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.D.Sugumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) -----

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act, 2023, in Crime No. 341 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/6

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner had transported 1/4 unit of river sand by using bullock cart without any valid permission from the Government of Tamil Nadu. Hence the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submits that the petitioner had illegally transported quarter unit of river sand by using bullock cart without any valid permission from the Government of Tamil Nadu. Therefore, he strongly opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

2/6

5. Taking into the fact that the petitioner had transported huge quantity of river sand from river bank without any valid permission from the Officials of the Government, the gravity of offence was committed by the petitioner herein and the investigation in this case is yet to be concluded, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 23.09.2025 MSM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi, Thirupathur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Vaniyambadi Taluk Police Station Thirupathur District.

[Crime No. 341 of 2025]

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/6

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

MSM Crl.O.P.No. 26202 of 2025 23.09.2025 4/6