← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17187/2004dismissed

T.Subash v. The Presiding Officer

2018-06-25Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN W.P.Nos.17187, 17188 and 17189 of 2004 T.Subash .. Petitioner in 17187 of 2004 M.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner in 17188 of 2004 V.Sivanesan .. Petitioner in 17189 of 2004 Vs.

1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem.

2. M/s.Ashok Leyland, 175, Hosur Industrial Complex, Hosur, - 636 126.

.. Respondents (in all WPs) Prayer in WP.No.17187 of 2004: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, after calling for the records relating to the Common Award dated 17.09.2003 passed by the first respondent Labour Court, Salem in I.D.No.506 of 2000 and to quash the same in so far as it has denied the normal relief of backwages and accordingly substitute the same by awarding backwages as well.

Prayer in WP.No.17188 of 2004: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, after calling for the records relating to the Common Award dated 17.09.2003 passed by the first respondent Labour Court, Salem in I.D.No.507 of 2000 and to quash the same in so far as it has denied the normal relief of backwages and accordingly substitute the same by awarding backwages as well.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Prayer in WP.No.17189 of 2004: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, after calling for the records relating to the Common Award dated 17.09.2003 passed by the first respondent Labour Court, Salem in I.D.No.508 of 2000 and to quash the same in so far as it has denied the normal relief of backwages and accordingly substitute the same by awarding backwages as well.

For Petitioners : Mr. V.Govardhan (in all WPs) For Respondents : R-1 Court : Mr.Sanjay Mohan for M/s.S.Ramasubramanian for R2 (in all WPs)

O R D E R

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that during the pendency of these writ petitions, settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and the second respondent, therefore, nothing survives in these writ petitions. Recording the submission of Counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem.

+1cc to Mr.S.Rama Subramanian, Advocate, S.R.No.40037 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.40933 W.P.Nos.17187 to 17189 of 2004 GSP(31/07/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/