Madras High CourtWP/37683/2004dismissed as infructuous

I. Nandini v. The Director, Evaluation And

2017-08-24Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.08.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.37683 of 2004 I.Nandini ... Petitioner Vs.

The Director, Evaluation and Applied Research Department, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.

... Respondent Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondent in Pro.O.P.No.4229/E. & A.R./A.1/2004 dated 03.12.2004, quash the same and issue consequential directions to the respondent to retain the petitioner in the same station/post .

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sasikumar for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mr.A.Zakkir Hussain Government Advocate

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.

Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gv https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Director, Evaluation and Applied Research Department, Kuralagam, Chennai-600 108.

+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 62119 W.P.No.37683 of 2004 msm(co) aa19/09/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/