B.Anandhavalli v. State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN B.Anandhavalli ... Petitioner Vs.

State represented by

1. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore SP Office, Cuddalore District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Oomangalam Police Sation, Cuddalore District.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.11.2024 and to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner's life.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arasu Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran, Additional Public Prosecutor ******

O R D E R

When the matter is called for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents would submit that based on the complaint filed by the petitioner, a case has been registered in C.S.R.No.544 of 2024 and the respondent police enquired into the matter and closed the case as 'mistake of fact'.

In view of the above submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition stands dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. 06.01.2025 Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order cgi 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore SP Office, Cuddalore District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Oomangalam Police Sation, Cuddalore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

3/4

P.VELMURUGAN, J., cgi 06.01.2025 4/4