B. Puniakotti v. The Director Of Municipal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.09.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.37777 of 2004 and W.P.MP.No.45322 of 2004 B.Puniakotti ...Petitioner Vs.

1. The Director of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai -5.

2. The Commissioner of Madhavaram Municipality, Madhavaram, Chennai -60. ... Respondents Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the second respondent dated 11.08.2004 and 21.09.2004 made in Na.Ka.No.5368/2004/C1 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to go on voluntary retirement on 30.09.2004 without deductions of any amount from the salary or from the retirement benefits of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Peter Francis For Respondent : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar vv/kas To

1. The Director of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai -5.

2. The Commissioner of Madhavaram Municipality, Madhavaram, Chennai -60.

+1cc to Government Pleader sr.70122 W.P.No.37777 of 2004 ssI(co) ss(26/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/