P.Krishnasamy v. The Union Territory Of Puducherry

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-12-2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR WMP. 40780 of 2024 IN WP. 37722 OF 2024 P.KRISHNASAMY S/O.V.K.PALANISAMY, NO.66 KAMATCHI AMMAN KOIL STREET, PUDUCHERRY 605001.

PETITIONER(S) Vs THE UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT (HRI AND WAKF), DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, ART AND CULTURE (CO-OPERATION), CHIEF SECRETARIAT, GOUBERT AVENUE, PUDUCHERRY 605001. AND 3 OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) For Petitioner(s): M.VELMURUGAN [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity]. Page Nos.1/4

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'original impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 21.10.2024 bearing reference No.2110/CHRI/PA/2024' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Mr.M.Velmurugan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the original impugned order is not readily available with the petitioner at the time of filing of the writ petition but a photo copy of the impugned order is filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMP.

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned order is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

Page Nos.2/4

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S., J] [K.R.S., J] 10.12.2024 (2/2) mk Page Nos.3/4

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., mk WMP. 40780 of 2024 IN WP. 37722 OF 2024 10.12.2024 (2/2) Page Nos.4/4