← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl./1129/2025dismissed

K.Thulasi v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-10-22Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-10-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

1. K.Thulasi W/o.Kalaicheliyan, No. 26, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Thodapadi Post, Vellore District.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police Kallakurichi District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Thirukovilur, Kallakurichi District.

3.The inspector of Police Sankarapuram Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

4.The Thasildhar Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurici District.

5.Kulasekara Azhvaar S/o.Ramanathan, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Kaduvanur post, Vanapuram Taluk, kallakurichi District.

6.Poongothai

W/o.Kulasekara Azhvaar, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Kaduvanur post, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi district.

Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to direct the 3rd respondent to provide police protection of petitioner house construction from the respondents 5 and 6 take necessary legal action of petitioner complaint dt. 03.09.2025 considering the petitioner representation dt. 03.09.2025 and 25.09.2025 and pass such further order or other orders. For Appellant(s):

Mr.T.Balachandran For Respondent:

Mr.R.Vinodhraja, Government Advocate [Crl.Side] - R1 to R4

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to provide police protection to the petitioner to construct house in her property and to take necessary legal action against the respondents 5 and 6 on the basis of her complaint dated 03.09.2025 and representations dated 03.09.2025 and 25.09.2025.

2. According to the petitioner, she is the owner of Survey No.131/1. Whereas, the respondents 5 and 6 claims to be owners of 131/60 and 131/69 and

they had already filed a suit in O.S.No.248 of 2024 for permanent injunction. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondents 5 and 6 are interfering with the construction being done in her land. Hence, the present petition has been filed.

3. As there is dispute between the parties with regard to their immovable properties, there cannot be any blanket direction to the police. Since, the respondents 5 and 6 have already filed a suit for permanent injunction, the petitioner may also file a counter claim in the said suit.

4. With the above observations, this Writ Petition is dismissed. 22-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes vrc

To 1.The Superintendent of Police Kallakurichi District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Thirukovilur, Kallakurichi District.

3.The inspector of Police Sankarapuram Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

4.The Thasildhar Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurici District.

N.SATHISH KUMAR J.

vrc 22-10-2025