Saranay Alias Saranya v. State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Saranay Alias Saranya D/o.Chinnadurai, No.77, Koil near Rajakkal, Kodhandawar Nagar, Gudiyattam Taluk, Vellore District.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. State Rep By its, The Inspector of Police, Melapatti Police Station, Vellore District. (Crime No.71 of 2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in crime No. 71 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s):

C.Deepak Kumar P.Hasnah For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 109(1) and 351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.71 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the she is the wife of the defacto complainant. The petitioner along with other accused/A1, attacked the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences who objected to their illicit relationship. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no one was injured in this case and a false complaint has been registered against her. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases against her. Therefore, he prays to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, reported the petitioner along with other accused/A1, attacked

and threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences. He further submitted that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioner and no injury was caused to the victim, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

25-09-2025 mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham.

2.State Rep By its, The Inspector of Police, Melapatti Police Station, Vellore District. (Crime No.71 of 2025) 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR J.

mpa CRL OP No. 26520 of 25-09-2025