Madras High CourtWP Crl./973/2025disposed of

Anitha v. The State Rep By,

2025-10-06Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-10-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR Anitha Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The State Rep By, The Superintendent Of Police, Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, Mayiladuthurai District.

2.The Inspector Of Police Seerkazhi Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.

3.Karunakaran Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide the Police Protection to up root the trees and harvesting the crops on the petitioner's property situated at old Survey No.75 new survey No.75/2, Radhanallur Village, Seerkazhi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District pursuant to the petitioners representation dated 13.09.2025.

1/4

For Petitioner (s):

Mr.R.Thirumoorthy For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Vinothraja for R1 and R2 Government advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide police protection on the ground that the 3 rd respondent is interfering with her possession.

2. According to the petitioner, she has purchased the property by virtue of the sale deed dated 15.07.2013 vide document no.1436 of 2013, however, the 3 rd respondent is interfering with the possession. Further, the suit filed by the 3 rd respondent for bare injunction was also dismissed for non-prosecution on 22.01.2025, hence seeks police protection.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the documents placed on record.

2/4

4. In view thereof a blanket direction cannot be issued to the police officials, if the possession of the petitioner is interfered or disturbed, it is left open to the petitioner to file a suit for permanent injunction. In the meanwhile, if any attempt is made to encroach the property of the petitioner, the petitioner is at liberty to file a complaint before the respondents-police and on such complaint, the police shall enquire into the complaint. Accordingly, the present Petition is disposed of. 06-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ssd To 1.The State Rep By, The Superintendent Of Police, Office Of The Superintendent Of Police, Mayiladuthurai District.

2.The Inspector Of Police Seerkazhi Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.

3/4

N.SATHISH KUMAR J.

ssd 06-10-2025 4/4