← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/27648/2025dismissed

Karthick @ Jaibhim Karthick v. State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

2025-10-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Karthick @ Jaibhim Karthick ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur.

Crime No.538 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.538 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.D.Dhanasekar For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.08.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 126(2), 1/4

309(4), 311, 351(3) of BNS Act, in Crime No.538 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner waylaid the de facto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.800/- at knife point. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.08.2025. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the bail petition of the petitioner was already dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.24972 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025. He further submitted that the petitioner has 11 previous cases. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail 2/4

5. Considering the nature of the allegations, the fact that the petitioner has bad antecedents, taking into fact that already this Court, by order dated 12.09.2025, dismissed the Crl.O.P.No.24972 of 2025 filed by the petitioner, and there is no change in circumstances. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 09.10.2025 cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

cda 09.10.2025 4/4