← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/26576/2025dismissed

Dinesh @ Pavadai Dinesh v. State Represented By, The Inspector Of Police,

2025-09-26Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Dinesh @ Pavadai Dinesh ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

Crime No.510 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.510 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner :

Mr.K.Selva Kumar For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/5

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.08.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 309(4), 311, 351(3) of BNS [equal to Sections 341, 294(b), 392, 397, 506(ii) of IPC] in Crime No.510 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant, who is running a petty shop, was on his way to the shop when the petitioner along with other accused waylaid him, abused him in filthy language, robbed a sum of Rs.500/- at knife point, and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/5

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner is involved in 14 previous cases.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the gravity of the offences and bad antecedents, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 26.09.2025 cda 3/5

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

cda To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri.

2.The Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

26.09.2025 4/5

5/5