← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/30899/2024dismissed

Sarath v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-12-11Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira5 pages

CRL OP NO.30899 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-12-2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO.30899 of 2024 Sarath Petitioner(s) Vs The Inspector of Police, Kavarapettai Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. / 482 of BNSS, 2023, pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused in the event of arrest in Crime No.773 of 2024 pending on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s):

Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondent(s):

S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.773 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons used filthy language, abused, assaulted and criminally intimidated the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

3.Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this court. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that the petitioner along with other accused persons used filthy language, abused, assaulted and criminally intimidated the defacto complainant. Subsequently, the injured discharged from Hospital. He would further submit that there are four previous cases as against the petitioner for theft and assault and one previous case under NDPS Act.

5.Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 11-12-2024 To 1.District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Gummidipoondi. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kavarapettai Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

ah CRL OP NO. 30899 of 2024

11.12.2024