← Library
Madras High CourtWP/36268/2002withdrawn dismissed

Reliance Industries Ltd., v. The Bharat Salchar Nigam Ltd.,

2018-07-11Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :11.07.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.No.36268 of 2002 Reliance Industries Ltd, A Company Incorporated Under the Provisions of the Companies Act and having its registered Office a At 3rd Floor, Maker Chambers IV.

222, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400 021.

and its Chennai Office at JVL Plaza, 501, Anna Salai Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

..Petitioner Vs

1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, A Company incorporated under the Companies Act being fully owned Government of India Comapany having their Chennai office at 33, Ethiraj Salai, Chennai - 600 008.

2. Chief General Manager, Telecommunications BSNL, Tamil Nadu Telecom Circle Development Wing 33 Ethiraj Salai, Chennai.

3. Assistant General Manager, (Tender) Tamil Nadu Telecom Circle Development Wing 33 Ethiraj Salai, Chennai.

4. Division Engineer (MM) Tamil Nadu Telecom Circle Development wing, 33 Ethiraj Salai, Chennai.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Union of India Through Secretary, Department of Telecommunications Sanchar Bhavan New Delhi -1.

6. Duraline India Pvt. Ltd., A Company incorporated in the Companies Act, having its office at s-6, Green park Extension, Near Uphaar Cinema, New Delhi - 110 016. ..Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration to declare that the corrigendum dated 23.07.2002 amending Clause 2 by introducing a fresh clause 2.3 to volume II Section V of the Tender Document bearing No.CGMP/CHI/PLB/Tender /Access/ 200203/01 dated 05.07.2002 is illegal, arbitrary non-est and of no legal efficacy whatsoever.

For Petitioner : Ms. V.Sharanya For Mr.S.Raghunathan For Respondents: No appearance

O R D E R

Ms.V.Sharanya, representing Mr.S.Raghunathan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought in the writ has become infructuous petition and she also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar maya +1 cc to Mr.S. Raghunathan, Advocate SR.45470 W.P.No.36268 of 200 (CS-VII) EU(14/08/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/