Latha v. State Rep By, Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.11.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.26599 of 2025 Latha ... Petitioner -vsState Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Vaazhapadi Police Station, Salem District.

(Crime No.358 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in Crime No.358 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.L.Thanasingh For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ********** 1/6

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 420, 465, 468, 471, 473, 109 of IPC and Section 82(d) of the Registration Act, 1908, in Crime No.358 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against this petitioner is that, this petitioner joining hands with other accused involved in fabrication of records and also for the purpose of grabbing the lands belongs to the defacto complainant, sold the property in favour of the third parties. Hence this case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner purchased the undivided share of the property belongs to the family and she has been falsely added as accused, and the entire transaction taken place in the year 2011. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for respondent would submit that the case was registered only recently, investigation in this 2/6

case is pending and no one arrested in this case. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. I have also gone through the FIR, it reveals that the fabrication of records taken place between the year 1997 and 2011 and the allegation against this petitioner is that she purchase the undivided portion of the land in the year 2011. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of petitioner is not necessary to the petitioner, and this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned District Munsif cum Magistrate, Vaazhapadi, Salem District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left 3/6

thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for the period of three weeks and thereafter as and when requires for interrogation; (c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 18.11.2025 4/6

rna Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To 1.The District Munsif cum Magistrate, Vaazhapadi, Salem District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Vaazhapadi Police Station, Salem District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

5/6

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

rna Crl.O.P.No.26599 of 2025 18.11.2025 6/6