Madras High CourtWP/17620/2004dismissed for default

S.Chidambaram v. The Regional Transport Officer

2017-07-10Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.17620 of 2004 S.Chidambaram .. Petitioner Vs.

The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Nagapattinam.

.. Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus against the respondent and call upon the records relating to Notification No.3498/A6/2003, dated 24.03.2004 issued by the respondent and quash the same and consequently by directing the respondent to consider and pass order on the application submitted by the petitioner for the renewal of the vehicle permit for the vehicle Maxi Cab having Registration No.TN-519293. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, Spl.G.P.

ORDER

When the Writ Petition came up for hearing on 06.07.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" after 10.07.2017 and though the Writ Petition is listed today (10.07.2017), there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

cs Copy to The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Nagapattinam.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, Sr. 48657 W.P.No.17620 of 2004 MV(CO) VR(07/08/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/