← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/29019/2023granted

Karuppannan v. Inspector Of Police

2023-12-28Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.12.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Crl.O.P.No.29019 of 2023 Karuppannan ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Namagiripet Police Station, Namakkal District Crime No.293 of 2023 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner / Accused on bail in Crime No.293 of 2023 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.W. Camyles Gandhi For Respondent : Mrs.G.V.Kasthuri Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.11.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 427,294(b), 1/5

506(ii) of I.P.C in Crime No.293 of 2023 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are neighbours and there was a pathway dispute between them, due to which the petitioner abused and attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries to him. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 19.11.2023 and hence, he seeks for granting of bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent submitted that there was a pathway dispute between the defacto complainant and the petitioner, due to which the petitioner abused and attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries to him. She would further submit that the injured discharged from the hospital. However, she opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

2/5

5.Heard both side and perused the materials available on record. 6.Considering the rival submissions made on either side and taking into consideration the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, and the fact that the injured discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Rasipuram and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every saturday at 10.a.m., for a period of four weeks. [d] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[g] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court 3/5

himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

28.12.2023 smn/shl To

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Rasipuram.

2. The Inspector of Police, Namagiripet Police Station, Namakkal District.

4. The Sub jail Rasipuram

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

P.DHANABAL, J.

smn/shl Crl.O.P.No.29019 of 2023 28.12.2023 5/5