Manikandan v. The State Represented By Its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 30992 of 2024 1.MANIKANNAN 2.ANAND 3.AJITHKUMAR 4.DHARMA PETITIONER(S) Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVENNAINALLUR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM. FIR NO.919/2024 RESPONDENT(S) For Petitioner(s):
S.PRAKASH For Respondent(s):
Mr.S.Santhosh Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.919 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 296(b), 324(3), 115(2), 132, 351(3) of BNS, the present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking anticipatory bail. Page No.1 of 4
2. Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioners, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioners seek indulgence of this Court. He further submits that the petitioners are college students and there are no previous cases against them and they are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court.
3. The case of the prosecution, as put forth by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that the petitioners were involved in sand theft and the defacto complainant / forest police official went to the site and apprehended petitioners 1 and 2, taking them away in a jeep. While in transit, the petitioners 3 and 4, along with the village residents, waylaid the jeep and assaulted and threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences. He further submitted that there are no previous cases against the petitioners.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions and accordingly, they are ordered to Page No.2 of 4
be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvennainallur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties, of which one shall be either mother or father of the petitioners, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 06.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.
[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
Anu [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during Page No.3 of 4
investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
12.12.2024 Anu To 1.THE STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUVENNAINALLUR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM.
2. The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvennainallur Page No.4 of 4